Explicador de métodos de direção de tráfego da Netskope

Descreva a situação — dispositivo gerenciado ou não, num site ou em trânsito, se o pacote de certificados pode ser instalado — e veja qual método de direção se encaixa: o cliente no endpoint, um túnel IPsec ou GRE, um proxy explícito, ou encadeamento a partir de um proxy que você já opera. Cada método lista o que custa, escolhido ou não. Determinístico e offline.

Redes

Os métodos, e o que cada um custa

  1. Cliente no endpointencaixa

    The endpoint agent is the recommended method for end-user traffic, and the only one that carries user identity and device posture with the flow rather than inferring them. It follows the user off the corporate network, which a tunnel from a site cannot do.

    • It has to be deployed and kept current on every device, which is an endpoint-management problem before it is a security one.
    • Steering exceptions live on the client, so a device that has been tampered with is a device whose exceptions you no longer control.
  2. Túnel IPsecnão se aplica aqui

    A tunnel steers a site. It cannot follow a user who is not at that site.

    • It knows the site, not the person. User identity has to come from somewhere else - commonly the client deployed alongside it purely to provision certificates and identify the user.
    • Build at least two tunnels to different data planes. One tunnel is a single point of failure for an entire site.
  3. Túnel GREnão se aplica aqui

    A tunnel steers a site. It cannot follow a user who is not at that site.

    • Unencrypted on that hop, so it belongs only where the path is genuinely trusted.
    • Same identity gap as IPsec: it knows the site.
  4. Proxy explícitopossível

    Point the browser or the operating system at the service and traffic goes there without an agent or a tunnel. It is the method for legacy and regulated environments, and for cases where policy-based routing cannot be configured.

    • It steers what is configured to use it, and nothing else. An application that ignores proxy settings is simply not steered, and nothing will tell you so.
    • It is a per-application or per-system setting, which means it is a per-application or per-system failure.
  5. Encadeamento de proxynão se aplica aqui

    There is no existing proxy to chain from. Introducing one to enable this would be adding a hop in order to have a hop.

    • The first proxy is still in the path and still yours to run, patch and troubleshoot. Two proxies fail in more ways than one.
    • Treat it as a phase rather than a destination, and record what would end it.

Vale saber

  • Steering decides what the edge can see. Everything downstream - inspection, data protection, policy - is limited by what arrived, and a connected client or an established tunnel is one checkpoint rather than proof that a particular request was inspected.
  • A steering bypass and a do-not-decrypt rule are different things. The first means the traffic never reaches the service; the second means it arrives and is not opened. Certificate-pinned applications usually need the first, and confusing them produces a policy that looks applied and never ran.
Endpoint da APIGEThttps://ronutz.com/api/v1/netskope-steering-explainerDocumentado, não servido. Abre a especificação.

Referências