"Tor is only for criminals"

privacydark web

Tor's daily users are overwhelmingly ordinary: people evading censorship, journalists protecting sources, researchers, and the privacy-minded - the network was funded to protect exactly them.

Onion routing began at the US Naval Research Laboratory, and the Tor Project documents its user base; anonymity systems only work when lawful users provide the crowd.

Tor is regularly described as a tool for criminals, and the framing survives because criminal use is the part that produces news coverage. The usage data does not support it as a characterization: the overwhelming majority of Tor traffic is ordinary browsing by people who do not want to be tracked or who are in places where the ordinary web is filtered.

The design point is that anonymity cannot be selective. A network that could exclude bad actors would need to identify users, which is the property it exists to remove, so it protects the journalist, the dissident, the abuse survivor and the criminal with exactly the same mechanism. That is not a flaw in the implementation; it is the definition of the thing.

The funding history complicates the popular framing usefully. Tor originated in United States naval research and has received substantial government funding, for the sound reason that an anonymity network is only anonymous if many different kinds of people use it: intelligence traffic on a network used exclusively by spies is not hidden at all. That means the same governments sometimes prosecuting its users have an institutional interest in its existence, which is a genuinely awkward fact and a real one.

Disputed / commonly mistold A popular version of this story is inaccurate - see the note above.

← All glossary entries