How I teach

An instructor who built these systems before teaching them.

I began teaching alongside engineering work. The examples, the failure modes and the operational questions I bring into a course come from years spent designing, deploying and troubleshooting the systems being discussed, and you can inspect how I explain things, in hundreds of articles and tools, before you book anything.

  • F5 · Fortinet · Extreme Networks · Netskope
  • English · Brazilian Portuguese
  • Live virtual · classroom · worldwide
  • Delivered through Red Education

Who I teach, and where to start

Three kinds of reader arrive here with three different questions. Each has its own door.

  • I know which course I need

    An engineer or administrator who has already picked the course. The catalogue lists every course I currently teach, with duration, outline and the certification it supports; each one has a request link that goes to Red Education.

    Go to the catalogue
  • I need to train a team

    A manager with six, fifteen or forty engineers, mixed experience levels, a time zone and a date. A private class can be shaped around the group and run in your working hours; the two engagements Red Education published further down show what that looks like.

    Tell me about the team
  • I know the capability we need, not the course

    A new BIG-IP operations team, F5 administrators moving into WAF, a FortiGate team that keeps calling support, engineers moving to SASE. Start from the outcome; choosing the sequence is part of what I do.

    Start from the outcome

What I currently teach

These are the official courses I deliver today, by platform: the exact set, kept current, not a representative sample. When a course leaves my delivery portfolio it leaves this list; when one joins, it appears here.

Course names, durations and outlines follow the vendors' current material and are checked against it; the vendor remains the authoritative source for its own programme.

Red Education, wordmark in use since 2025

Looking beyond my own teaching portfolio?

Red Education delivers a far broader catalogue across networking, cybersecurity, cloud and adjacent technologies through its global instructor community, and can assemble several instructors around one requirement. If the course you need is not on this page, it is very likely there.

Red Education's catalogue

How I teach

The official curriculum defines what the course must cover. My role is to connect it to the mechanisms underneath, the operational consequences, and the kinds of problems engineers meet when the system is actually running. Three principles do most of the work.

  1. Mechanisms before memorisation

    A feature is explained by what it does to the packets, the sessions and the state, not by the position of a checkbox, because the engineer who understands the mechanism can reason about a situation the slide never showed.

  2. Practice with purpose

    Hands-on labs are a core part of the technical courses I deliver, in the official lab environment provided for the curriculum. They are there to test understanding, not to imitate a recipe: the point is to see the system behave, break it, and explain what happened.

  3. Adapt to the room

    The same curriculum needs very different emphasis depending on who is sitting there. Experienced groups move quickly into application and troubleshooting; newer groups spend the first hours on the foundations the labs rest on. Questions from your own environment are welcome, and often the best part of the day.

Since 1996 the work was implementation: designing networks and standing them up, troubleshooting them under pressure, and being the person called when a critical availability or security incident halted a business, for vendors and for some of the largest organisations in Brazil. That is where the examples come from.

Why live technical training still matters

Information is no longer scarce. Vendor documentation, self-paced courses, videos and AI can explain almost any feature on demand; they are excellent learning tools, I use them myself, and they have changed what live instruction has to contribute.

The value of a live instructor is somewhere else: noticing why someone has misunderstood a mechanism, asking the next question, changing the explanation, connecting one feature to the rest of the system, answering the question behind the question, and working through what happens when the clean example stops matching the real system. Explanations have become abundant; that raises the bar for what a classroom should add, and it is exactly where three decades of engineering practice matter.

On this site the ladder is visible: read an article, explore a tool, work through a study guide, then sit in a course where the explanation adapts to you. Training is the step between understanding something yourself and applying senior judgement to a decision, which is what advisory is for.

Evidence from students

Five of the recorded reviews and recommendations, chosen for what each one shows: the explanations, the pace, the depth, and what the training was worth back at work. Every one is verbatim, with its source.

  • On the explanations and the pace, F5

  • On technical depth and engagement, F5 LTM

  • On a Fortinet class

  • On what it was worth back at work, four courses on BIG-IP

  • On an Extreme Networks course, and the implementation that followed

All training endorsements

Training for teams, not just seats

Two engagements Red Education published, with me among the instructors. Each shows what a large training engagement actually involves: several cohorts, mixed experience, a business dependency on the capability being built, and geographically distributed teams.

  • Fortinet, wordmark in use since 2000

    43 engineers · Fortinet · an enterprise capability build

    A multinational IT services firm had won a large deal without the certified Fortinet engineers to deliver it. Forty-three people went through the FortiGate administration course in mixed-experience groups, as the third part of a certification programme.

  • F5, wordmark in use since 2013

    Two cities · F5 iRules · advanced engineering enablement

    Engineers split between Singapore and Hong Kong needed to write custom traffic-management logic on their own BIG-IP estate. Delivered as live virtual training so both locations sat in one classroom.

Both engagements, in detail

Where the classes are, and when

Delivered across the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific, in classes scheduled around Australian, Singaporean, Indian, European and American working days. The clocks below are live, in the regions I teach in; set a class start time and see what it means everywhere else.

in
  • --:--United StatesPacific TimeAmerica/Los_Angeles--:--
  • --:--United StatesMountain TimeAmerica/Denver--:--
  • --:--United StatesCentral TimeAmerica/Chicago--:--
  • --:--United StatesEastern TimeAmerica/New_York--:--
  • --:--BrazilBrasília Time (São Paulo)America/Sao_Paulo--:--
  • --:--United KingdomGreenwich Mean Time (London)Europe/London--:--
  • --:--European UnionCentral European TimeEurope/Berlin--:--
  • --:--FinlandEastern European Time (Helsinki)Europe/Helsinki--:--
  • --:--United Arab EmiratesGulf Standard Time (Dubai)Asia/Dubai--:--
  • --:--IndiaIndia Standard TimeAsia/Kolkata--:--
  • --:--ThailandIndochina Time (Bangkok)Asia/Bangkok--:--
  • --:--SingaporeSingapore TimeAsia/Singapore--:--
  • --:--PhilippinesPhilippine Time (Manila)Asia/Manila--:--
  • --:--South KoreaKorea Standard Time (Seoul)Asia/Seoul--:--
  • --:--AustraliaAustralian Eastern Time (Sydney)Australia/Sydney--:--
  • --:--New ZealandNew Zealand Time (Auckland)Pacific/Auckland--:--

Times come from the browser's own time-zone data (the IANA zones named in each row), so daylight-saving shifts are already applied. Nothing is sent anywhere.

Countries delivered to so far

Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, the Philippines, China, Japan, India and Bangladesh; the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Italy, Poland, Sweden, Finland and Norway; the United Arab Emirates and Ghana; Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Peru, Colombia, Panama and Mexico; Canada and the United States.

Platforms used in delivery

Live remote classes run on Zoom by preference, with Microsoft Teams and Google Meet equally supported when a customer's platform policy calls for it. Hands-on labs run in the official lab environment for each course: Red Education's own lab infrastructure, CloudShare, Kyndryl Cloud Uplift (formerly Skytap), ReadyTech Axis or Amazon WorkSpaces, whichever the curriculum specifies.

Red Education, wordmark in use since 2025

The platform behind the class

I work full time for Red Education, a global Authorized Training Center, and every piece of technical education described on this page, training delivery and content development, workshops, bootcamps, knowledge transfers and enablement sessions, is delivered through it. That is an advantage rather than a boundary: Red Education brings the vendor authorizations, the lab infrastructure, the scheduling and regional coverage, public and private classes, account management, and a bench of more than fifty instructors for the requirements one person cannot cover.

When you request a class, ask for me by name. Instructor allocation stays with Red Education and depends on schedule, region and authorization, so the request is for my availability rather than a guarantee of it.

What happens after the class

The course ends. The reference material does not.

  • The next course

    Each course page names what it prepares for and what naturally follows it, so a team can plan a sequence rather than a single week.

  • The certification

    Official courses support the knowledge and skills behind the vendor certifications, and the free study guides here cover what each exam actually tests. The goal of the class is operational understanding, not memorising likely questions, and no course confers a certification by itself.

  • The reference shelf

    Hundreds of articles, the tools and the glossary stay available after the last lab, written by the same instructor on the same platforms, so what was explained in the room can be looked up again months later.

Three decades, one through-line

From building computers as a teenager in 1991, through formal teaching as part of every technical role since 1997, to full-time global instruction from 2020. The teaching is not the recent part; the exclusivity is. The whole story is worth reading if you want to understand the experience behind it.

Read the full history →

Tell me what your team needs to be able to do

How many people need to learn it, what they already know, which time zone they work in, and when you need them ready. That is enough to answer with a course, a sequence or a private class, and to put you in touch with the right person at Red Education to handle the request.

Looking for technical advisory rather than training? See Advisory
Looking for a conference talk or an internal session rather than a course? See Speaking